Validity of Battler's Logic Error Plan (Discussion)

This is a discussion me and Apos had regarding the validity of logic error, both sides don’t mind the discussion being public and what not, so this is if people want to view the discussion fully and hopefully achieve truth and possibly be persuaded by either side. Me (Aphelios/Varus): Affirming Logic Error Apos: Skeptic in response and also in negation I guess THIS DISCUSSION HAS SPOILERS ON THE CULPRITS IDENTITY (just saying I never conceded to the methodology part I kept attacking it, so idk what hes trying to say) Bro, evenyou dont believe I conceded on that point nigga 😭😭 You literally still responded to me on a conceded point by that logic https://streamable.com/jk0h85 Cause you know that I didnt concede, you’re just adding that in to try and dickeat, in fact you are the only one who conceded on a point I just said we should move on to other points cause it will go circular Me: Let's establish 3 motives for Battler: 1. Wanting to defeat Erika 2. Resurrection Beatrice's memories (I know you wont grant this yet, but we will investigate this matter soon) 3. Prove he's reached Beatrice's truth. and let's establish a fact, this one is a spoiler in regards to the culprits identity: ||Sayo Yasuda (Shannon) is the culprit, and Shannon also = Kanon, So Beatrice = Shannon = Kanon.|| If you take a look at what you're saying, you're positing that Battler had pitied her and fell for her traps, which is true, I agree that this occurred, but with Battler intentionally …