Patrick Jane PF analysis rebunk

Hello! In this document, I’ll rebunk Patrick Jane’s PF analysis. The debunk is here. Important Note: I will be thinking you’ve read the analysis and the debunk before you start reading this rebunk Made by: Arthen Contacts: Discord: svakeloo TikTok: arthenam Rebunking validity of use of chaotic system First, in the rebunk, the creator of it, Federal-Manner3880 (who I’ll call federal) is debunking the validity of use of Lorenz equation in my analysis. I didn’t use Lorenz's equation as exactly the same thing, I used it as an example. Now I think he misinterpreted my analysis. I know that her shuffle of cards is not random and will not make the deck random, I never was thinking that. The chaos system prediction is Patrick PREDICTING her last 2 shuffles, how she will shuffle the deck in the last second. For people that were lazy and didn’t read PF analysis doc: there was a context part, where I said that 1 second before she finishes shuffling - he guesses the dealer card and that 1 last second is when she did 2 shuffles. And her WAY OF SHUFFLING is a chaotic system. He predicted her WAY OF SHUFFLING which is a chaotic system since Van Pelt’s personality can react a bit differently in almost the same conditions but that’s the point, she won’t react the same way, so Patrick has to have almost perfect data which I listed in the PF analysis doc. Amount of data Patrick had “This means, there was no need for him to shuffle 72 (it's 76) cards in his head. Only 38. And since he …