Doc

Memory loss plan debunk refutal

Also listed as: memory loss rebunk · Memory loss debunk refutal

This entry was filled in automatically; the author may be wrong. Suggest a correction.

File

Google DocSaved

2 pages1,211 wordsSaved 2026-11-15

Open the original Google Doc

Text preview
Light’s memory loss plan debunk rebuttal Made by: Hans I think debunking the memory loss plan as being luck based or plot armor is just a convenient and lazy excuse to discredit Light given the overwhelming majority of people watching and reading Death Note were rooting for L especially because he was at a seemingly overwhelming disadvantage (I disagree with it being an overwhelming disadvantage but that's a different topic). If you actually unpack the plan in the manga (as manga goes more in depth), the foundation of the plan makes sense. The reason I use the word 'unpack' specifically is because Light doesn't explain everything in full 100% detail which makes sense because a manga chapter can only be 20 pages. He explains the majority of his plan and the rest can be inferred and deduced from the information we've already gotten. His plan involves a series of predictions on what he thinks will happen after his memories are given up. The majority of these predictions are based on his emotional understanding of humans, specifically L and what he thinks L will do as well as the taskforce and the nature of power-hungry, ambitious and greedy individuals. a. First thing that people criticize. Light tells Rem to give the death note to someone of 'some status' who lusts for power. This is a popular criticism as Higuchi ended up being the perfect fake Kira for Light and L to catch. However it never had to be Higuchi as this is just basic psychology, EU and logical reasoning at …

The first lines of the plain-text copy. Formatting and images are only in the PDF/DOCX.

Listed in