Doc

Cognition Scaling

This entry was filled in automatically; the author, characters may be wrong. Suggest a correction.

File

Google DocSaved

2 pages482 wordsSaved 2026-11-15

Open the original Google Doc

Text preview
Cognition Scaling By u/No-Engineering9521 Cognition scaling is a scaling system that values a character’s thought process, line of reasoning, and evaluations. It mainly stems from these ideas: * Intelligence is based on the line of thinking a character construes prior to executing their feat. For this scaling system to scale a feat in the first place the character’s thoughts and reasoning must be completely accessible, or their thought’s must be implied. * A character's intelligence is based on how logical their chain of reasoning follows per feat and how a character’s thoughts evaluate through any possible premises and assess the situation/problem, concluding in some sort of action. As well as how well they understand the effects their actions bring, and how these effects will benefit towards their goal. * Whether a feat is onscreen or offscreen or even a statement is irrelevant to whether it can be scaled, if there is some kind of thought process shown or implied. It is scalable under this system. But offscreen feats with an implied thought process will be inherently ranked lower than an onscreen feat where we have knowledge of the character’s cognition constantly. * Conclusions without the methodology of how it occurred is not scalable. For example, Alakazam being stated to have 5000 IQ scales nowhere. If this were to be scalable under Cognition Scaling. If we knew the questions on the IQ test, and Alakazam’s thoughts while writing it were known. Then it would be …

The first lines of the plain-text copy. Formatting and images are only in the PDF/DOCX.

Listed in